<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Distributed Revision Control and Gnome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=19</link>
	<description>Kevin Kubasik's Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/#comment-732</guid>
		<description>I recommend you to try SourceAnywhere. It&#039;s a SQL-based source control system. It&#039;s stable, fast and secure.

Both standalone and hosted editions are provided.

Thanks.

Catherine Sea
http://www.scmsoftwareconfigurationmanagement.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend you to try SourceAnywhere. It&#8217;s a SQL-based source control system. It&#8217;s stable, fast and secure.</p>
<p>Both standalone and hosted editions are provided.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Catherine Sea<br />
<a href="http://www.scmsoftwareconfigurationmanagement.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.scmsoftwareconfigurationmanagement.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For Once I Oneder &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>For Once I Oneder &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] A few days ago I posted on a couple of different options for distributed source control based off of Gnomes new SVN server. In that post I had a short summary of SVK use (obviously there are more advanced options, but its all available in the svk help) and there&#8217;s already a nice post on git-svn. So I felt that as a bzr fan and part-time Ubuntu dev, I should slap together a short walk through on using bzr&#8217;s svn plugin to work on a Gnome project while still using the subversion repository as HEAD. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few days ago I posted on a couple of different options for distributed source control based off of Gnomes new SVN server. In that post I had a short summary of SVK use (obviously there are more advanced options, but its all available in the svk help) and there&#8217;s already a nice post on git-svn. So I felt that as a bzr fan and part-time Ubuntu dev, I should slap together a short walk through on using bzr&#8217;s svn plugin to work on a Gnome project while still using the subversion repository as HEAD. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For Once I Oneder &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>For Once I Oneder &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] Navigate/Search        &#171; Distributed Revision Control and Gnome [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Navigate/Search        &laquo; Distributed Revision Control and Gnome [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I was thinking about trying it, but I don&#039;t think mercurial has the same support for SVN as a base branch that we see with tools like SVK or git-svn....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about trying it, but I don&#8217;t think mercurial has the same support for SVN as a base branch that we see with tools like SVK or git-svn&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amino</title>
		<link>http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>amino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Mercurial (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial)?
This is a serious contender: fast, simple, reliable...
It has been chosen by Sun to managed OpenSolaris and Java (OpenJDK, JVM, ...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Mercurial (<a href="http://www.selenic.com/mercurial)?" rel="nofollow">http://www.selenic.com/mercurial)?</a><br />
This is a serious contender: fast, simple, reliable&#8230;<br />
It has been chosen by Sun to managed OpenSolaris and Java (OpenJDK, JVM, &#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik's Stuff</title>
		<link>http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik's Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kubasik.net/blog/2007/01/04/19/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Distributed svn...&lt;/strong&gt;

So, Gnome finally abandon cvs. It was quite a few years to late in my opinion. The good thing about waiting is that it let the distributed revision control system grow and become more stable/mature. Yet, when gnome migrated, they choose to go with........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Distributed svn&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So, Gnome finally abandon cvs. It was quite a few years to late in my opinion. The good thing about waiting is that it let the distributed revision control system grow and become more stable/mature. Yet, when gnome migrated, they choose to go with&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
