Comments on: Failed Movable Type Experiment http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=failed-movable-type-experiment Kevin Kubasik's Personal Blog Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:28:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Theme Create http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-669 Theme Create Mon, 11 May 2009 02:28:32 +0000 http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/#comment-669 This is exactly what I was looking for. Joomla is a top notch CMS and this is a perfect example why. This is exactly what I was looking for. Joomla is a top notch CMS and this is a perfect example why.

]]> By: Joomla Template Creator http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-670 Joomla Template Creator Mon, 11 May 2009 02:28:32 +0000 http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/#comment-670 Joomla is a top notch CMS and this post is a perfect example why. Thank you for this information. Joomla is a top notch CMS and this post is a perfect example why. Thank you for this information.

]]> By: Kevin Kubasik http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-312 Kevin Kubasik Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:23:08 +0000 http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/#comment-312 @James: It was really the mediocre performance of Wordpress. I've heard MT not only handles traffic better (generates static pages) but has a _much_ easier/prettier admin interface. While I found the first point to be largely irrelivent with the advent of wp-supercache, the second is still pretty valid. MT does have a faster/easier to use admin interface, but wordpress 2.5 is supposed to overhaul most of that so well see... I really should just do the Django thing (good learning experience) but I really prefer my blog to be a passive thing, and not something I worry about the technical components of (beyond a few fun hacks every now and then) ;) @Dread Knight: They seem like overkill, I really just want a blog, my last look at Joomla made it really too heavy for my interest (im on shared hosting, so anything CPU laden doesn't tend to do to well, although bandwidth is easy to come by). I've used drupal on several occasions before and have had mixed results, but that was almost 2 years ago, so its probably worth another pass at some point. However, in all honesty, if I ever switch again, it will probably be to some python-powered blogging platform, as I really have grown tired of PHP's quarks (and some PHP scripters abilities to make even simple logic almost unreadable, as a general rule, tracing a train of thought in python is significantly easier, making little modifications to a platform much more managable) DISCLAMER!!!! These are gross generalizations that I have noticed and not hard truth. Just my $0.02, please feel free to correct me, just be civil. @James: It was really the mediocre performance of WordPress. I’ve heard MT not only handles traffic better (generates static pages) but has a _much_ easier/prettier admin interface. While I found the first point to be largely irrelivent with the advent of wp-supercache, the second is still pretty valid. MT does have a faster/easier to use admin interface, but wordpress 2.5 is supposed to overhaul most of that so well see…

I really should just do the Django thing (good learning experience) but I really prefer my blog to be a passive thing, and not something I worry about the technical components of (beyond a few fun hacks every now and then) ;)

@Dread Knight: They seem like overkill, I really just want a blog, my last look at Joomla made it really too heavy for my interest (im on shared hosting, so anything CPU laden doesn’t tend to do to well, although bandwidth is easy to come by). I’ve used drupal on several occasions before and have had mixed results, but that was almost 2 years ago, so its probably worth another pass at some point. However, in all honesty, if I ever switch again, it will probably be to some python-powered blogging platform, as I really have grown tired of PHP’s quarks (and some PHP scripters abilities to make even simple logic almost unreadable, as a general rule, tracing a train of thought in python is significantly easier, making little modifications to a platform much more managable)

DISCLAMER!!!!
These are gross generalizations that I have noticed and not hard truth. Just my $0.02, please feel free to correct me, just be civil.

]]> By: Dread Knight http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-311 Dread Knight Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:00:57 +0000 http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/#comment-311 I suggest you try an open source content managing system such as drupal (www.drupal.org) or joomla (www.joomla.org). I suggest you try an open source content managing system such as drupal (www.drupal.org) or joomla (www.joomla.org).

]]> By: James Henstridge http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-310 James Henstridge Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:06:21 +0000 http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/#comment-310 Was there any features in particular in MovableType that caused you to attempt a switch? Was there any features in particular in MovableType that caused you to attempt a switch?

]]> By: Rob Douglas http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-309 Rob Douglas Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:40:03 +0000 http://kubasik.net/blog/2008/02/27/failed-movable-type-experiment/#comment-309 Would i be able to get an invite? also, symantec corp complained of a "wp-stats[1].htm" when visiting this page.. odd.. ~Rob D Would i be able to get an invite?

also, symantec corp complained of a “wp-stats[1].htm” when visiting this page.. odd..

~Rob D

]]>