Comments on: Code Review in Rietveld with bzr/Bazaar http://kubasik.net/blog/2009/02/09/code-review-in-rietveld-with-bzrbazaar/ Kevin Kubasik's Personal Blog Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:59:31 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: RJ Ryan http://kubasik.net/blog/2009/02/09/code-review-in-rietveld-with-bzrbazaar/comment-page-1/#comment-758 RJ Ryan Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:10:18 +0000 http://kubasik.net/blog/?p=195#comment-758 Thanks a lot for this! We're going to demo using Rietveld for code reviews in Mixxx (http://mixxx.org) and this looks like just the tool we need to get it integrated into our workflow. Thanks a lot for this! We’re going to demo using Rietveld for code reviews in Mixxx (http://mixxx.org) and this looks like just the tool we need to get it integrated into our workflow.

]]> By: Christian Reis http://kubasik.net/blog/2009/02/09/code-review-in-rietveld-with-bzrbazaar/comment-page-1/#comment-497 Christian Reis Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:05:55 +0000 http://kubasik.net/blog/?p=195#comment-497 Hey, neat patch. I wonder if you would be a happier camper using bzrlib instead of running it in a separate shell; you depend on bzr anyway, so it's there. I wrote a little branch analyzer using bzrlib and was just shocked at how easy it was. Hey, neat patch. I wonder if you would be a happier camper using bzrlib instead of running it in a separate shell; you depend on bzr anyway, so it’s there. I wrote a little branch analyzer using bzrlib and was just shocked at how easy it was.

]]> By: Jonathan Lange http://kubasik.net/blog/2009/02/09/code-review-in-rietveld-with-bzrbazaar/comment-page-1/#comment-496 Jonathan Lange Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:55:49 +0000 http://kubasik.net/blog/?p=195#comment-496 Very cool! Glad to see the Bazaar toolchain expanding it's nebulous tendrils :) That said, as a Launchpad developer I have to ask: what don't you like about our code review system? what can we do better? Very cool! Glad to see the Bazaar toolchain expanding it’s nebulous tendrils :)

That said, as a Launchpad developer I have to ask: what don’t you like about our code review system? what can we do better?

]]>